Posted inInteresting Papers
Evaluation of prone vs supine positioning in fresh rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated with pars plana vitrectomy and gas
This prospective, randomized controlled trial compared supine (face-up) versus prone (face-down) positioning after vitrectomy surgery with gas bubble placement for recent rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs). The study included 72 eyes, with 37 in the supine group and 35 in the prone group. After 3 months of follow-up, the single surgery retinal reattachment rates were similar in both groups (97.3% supine vs. 94.3% prone). Best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly in both groups postoperatively, with no significant difference between the supine and prone groups at the final visit. Intraocular pressure, cataract formation rates, and other complications were also comparable between the two positioning strategies. The authors concluded that supine positioning is as safe and effective as prone positioning for achieving retinal reattachment with gas tamponade in RRD surgery.



















