đź§  Targeting mTOR: A New Frontier in PVR Prevention?

đź§  Targeting mTOR: A New Frontier in PVR Prevention?

Ophthalmology Board Exam MCQs on mTOR in PVR Prevention

Pretest on mTOR Inhibition in PVR Prevention

Select one answer per question. Feedback appears immediately after selection.

Question 1: In the multicenter cohort study, what was the relative risk (RR) of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)-related pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair in patients on systemic mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors compared to controls?
Correct: B. At 1-year follow-up, MTI therapy was associated with a relative risk of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.40–0.82) for PPV for RD (P < .001).
Question 2: Which pathway is primarily inhibited by systemic mTOR inhibitors (MTIs) to potentially prevent proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), according to the mechanistic rationale in the study?
Correct: B. MTIs inhibit the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, implicated in glial proliferation and fibrosis—hallmarks of PVR. Prior in vitro studies and animal models support this pathway’s role in retinal scarring and inflammation.
Question 3: In the study cohort of 681 patients on MTIs for unrelated conditions undergoing RRD repair, what was the incidence of subsequent retinal detachment (RD) at 1-year follow-up?
Correct: B. Subsequent RD occurred in 3.7% of the MTI group versus 6.3% in controls, with a relative risk of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.36–0.94; P = .03).
Question 4: Compared to controls, what was the most significantly increased adverse event associated with systemic mTOR inhibitor (MTI) therapy in the study?
Correct: C. MTI use was associated with hypertension in 46% of patients versus 31.3% in controls, highlighting the need for careful monitoring.
Question 5: The study found no significant difference in outcomes between systemic mTOR inhibitor (MTI) therapy and which other systemic therapy when used concomitantly with RRD repair?
Correct: B. No significant difference was found when comparing MTI therapy to systemic methotrexate (MTX) therapy, suggesting comparable efficacy for PVR prevention.

 

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the leading cause of surgical failure after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair, affecting up to 10% of cases. Despite decades of research, no pharmacologic agent has been formally approved for PVR prevention. A recent multicenter cohort study published in JAMA Ophthalmology may signal a turning point.

🔬 Study Overview

Researchers analyzed data from 681 patients across 15 countries who underwent primary RRD repair while receiving systemic mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor (MTI) therapy—such as sirolimus, everolimus, or temsirolimus—for unrelated medical conditions. These patients were matched against 47,626 controls not exposed to MTIs.

📉 Key Findings

At 1-year follow-up, MTI therapy was associated with:

Outcome MTI Group Control Group Relative Risk (RR) P Value
Subsequent RD 3.7% 6.3% 0.58 (95% CI: 0.36–0.94) .03
PPV for RD 6.2% 10.9% 0.57 (95% CI: 0.40–0.82) <.001
Complex RD Repair 4.8% 8.1% 0.60 (95% CI: 0.40–0.91) .01

No significant difference was found when comparing MTI therapy to systemic methotrexate (MTX) therapy, suggesting comparable efficacy.

🧬 Mechanistic Rationale

MTIs inhibit the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, implicated in glial proliferation and fibrosis—hallmarks of PVR. Prior in vitro studies and animal models support this pathway’s role in retinal scarring and inflammation.

⚠️ Safety Profile

MTI use was associated with increased rates of:

  • Stomatitis (1.5% vs 0%)
  • Hypertension (46% vs 31.3%)
  • Hyperlipidemia (25% vs 19.5%)
  • Dermatitis (10.3% vs 5.9%)

These findings underscore the need for careful patient selection and monitoring.

đź§­ Clinical Implications

This study suggests systemic MTIs may offer a protective effect against PVR-related complications post-RRD repair. While causality cannot be confirmed, the data support further investigation into MTIs—potentially via intravitreal delivery or combination therapy with MTX.

📌 Takeaway

Modulating mTOR signaling could represent a viable strategy for PVR prophylaxis. Prospective trials are warranted to validate efficacy, optimize dosing, and assess long-term safety.

“Patients who underwent initial RD repair and were concomitantly being treated with systemic MTI therapy were less likely to develop a subsequent PVR-related RD compared with matched patients not exposed to systemic MTI therapy.”
— Alsoudi et al., JAMA Ophthalmology, 2025


Citation:
Alsoudi AF, Loya A, Wai K, et al. Mammalian Target Rapamycin Inhibition as a Therapeutic Target for Prevention of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025;143(9):777-784. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.2497

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments