🧠 Rethinking Eye Screening in Pediatric NF1: What the Data Really Say

🧠 Rethinking Eye Screening in Pediatric NF1: What the Data Really Say

 

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a multisystem genetic disorder with hallmark ocular manifestations that can aid early diagnosis and guide clinical management. A recent large-scale pediatric study by Midena and Cosmo offers new insights into the prevalence, incidence, and genotype-phenotype correlations of four key ocular signs: optic pathway glioma (OPG), Lisch nodules (LNs), choroidal abnormalities (CAs), and retinal vascular abnormalities (RVAs).

 

πŸ‘οΈ Age Matters: When Do Ocular Signs Appear?

The study followed 237 NF1 children (≀16 years) over 12 years, revealing that most ocular signs develop early:

Ocular Sign Mean Age of Onset Incidence During Follow-Up
OPG 6.3 Β± 3.6 years 6.4%
LNs 7.1 Β± 3.0 years 22.4%
CAs 6.4 Β± 3.0 years 21.4%
RVAs 6.6 Β± 2.9 years 5.4%

Despite logistic regression curves showing rising probabilities with age (especially for CAs and LNs), the actual onset of new cases after age 8 was rare. This supports the idea that screening is most valuable before age 8, when diagnostic yield is highest.

Β 

🧬 Genotype-Phenotype Correlation: Truncating Mutations Hit Harder

Children with truncating mutations (frameshift/nonsense) showed:

  • A higher number of ocular signs (1.7 vs 0.9; P = .0019)
  • Increased prevalence of CAs (66.4% vs 37.5%; P = .0042)
  • More frequent RVAs (14.3% vs 0%; P = .0239)

Interestingly, LNs did not significantly differ between mutation types, suggesting independent developmental pathways.

πŸ” Diagnostic Implications

  • Revised NF1 criteria now accept β‰₯2 CAs as an alternative to β‰₯2 LNs.
  • Near-infrared imaging (NIR) is essential for detecting CAs and RVAs.
  • OCT of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) correlates with visual acuity and helps monitor OPG progression.

πŸ“Œ Clinical Takeaway

This study refines our understanding of NF1 ocular signs and their timing:

  • Early screening (before age 8) is critical for diagnosis and risk stratification.
  • CAs and LNs should be assessed independently, as they develop separately.
  • Genetic testing can inform prognosis, especially in truncating mutation carriers.

 

Midena E, Cosmo E. Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1)–Related Ocular Signs: New Insights on Their Prevalence, Incidence, and Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in NF1 Children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025;275:58–73. doi:

 

 

 

Yasunari Nodules: A Diagnostic Criterion for Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (Ophthalmology Retina, 2025):


πŸ”‘ Main Points

  • Clinical Case:

    • 38-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).
    • Normal visual acuity (20/20) and presence of Lisch nodules.
    • Fundus exam appeared normal.
  • Imaging Findings:

    • Infrared reflectance (IR) imaging revealed multiple patchy, highly reflective choroidal nodules.
    • OCT confirmed hyperreflective choroidal nodules corresponding to IR findings.
  • Yasunari Nodules:

    • Defined as asymptomatic choroidal lesions detectable on OCT and IR.
    • Considered highly specific for NF1, making them a valuable diagnostic criterion.
    • Can be missed on OCT alone, but are clearly visible on IR, underscoring the importance of reviewing IR images carefully.
  • Clinical Relevance:

    • Yasunari nodules provide a non-invasive, imaging-based diagnostic marker for NF1.
    • Their detection improves diagnostic accuracy, especially in patients with otherwise normal fundus exams.

πŸ“Œ Takeaway:
Yasunari nodules, best detected with infrared reflectance imaging, are a specific and reliable diagnostic sign of NF1. They may not always be obvious on OCT, so IR imaging should be systematically reviewed in suspected cases.


  1. Source: Ophthalmology Retina (2025), β€œYasunari Nodules: A Diagnostic Criterion for Neurofibromatosis Type 1.”

 

 

NF1 Ocular Signs Quiz

NF1 Ocular Signs Quiz

1. Which ocular sign in NF1 is most likely to develop before age 7 and shows minimal increase in prevalence after that age?

2. What imaging modality is most effective for detecting choroidal abnormalities (CAs) and retinal vascular abnormalities (RVAs) in NF1 patients?

3. According to the revised NF1 diagnostic criteria, how many choroidal abnormalities (CAs) are required to fulfill one diagnostic criterion?

4. Which type of NF1 mutation is associated with a higher number of ocular signs in pediatric patients?

5. Which ocular sign is not currently included in the formal NF1 diagnostic criteria?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments